There is little room for nuance when it comes to President BidenJoe BidenFather of Killed Marine: “Biden Turned His Back on Him” US leads military strike against ISIS-K planner. Pentagon official speaks with Chinese military for first time under Biden: MORE reportthe energy policy of. The Biden administration appears to operate from one of two realities. The more charitable interpretation suggests that administration officials are so pervaded by green ideology that they have lost the ability to recognize the economic, social and environmental damage their “Green New Deal” plans are causing. A less charitable approach would suggest they are comfortable relying on foreign competitors – and a few well-connected Washington insiders – for the energy that should be produced domestically.
From its earliest days, the Biden administration attacked and stifled American energy production. When campaigning, Biden and his running mate both vowed to stop fracking. Immediately after his election, Biden suspended all oil and gas rentals on federal lands. He then killed the Keystone XL pipeline and the thousands of jobs it supported, claiming the pipeline was not in the U.S. national interest. A few months later, he supported the lifting of sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, offering a major victory in energy and international politics for the Russian president. Vladimir PoutineDemocrats’ latest backdoor plan Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin to limit gun possession The White House brings together tech, education and banking executives for a cyber meeting Amazon and IBM executives among those who gathered at the White House for a cyber meeting on Wednesday PLUS and the oil giant Gazprom.
As the president’s anti-energy policies stifled domestic production and raised prices for consumers, Biden again snubbed U.S. energy producers by kneeling before OPEC and pleading for the oil cartel to rise. the production. He may be reliving the past, not remembering the fracking revolution once happened, and honestly believing America is still beholden to Middle Eastern oil. Whatever year the president thinks it might be, OPEC has rejected his request.
Of course, it’s not entirely surprising that the President’s energy policies have become increasingly hostile to domestic producers and favorable to our competitors. The president is living proof of the old adage: “When you go to bed with dogs, you get up with fleas”. Its energy advisers and closest appointees come from two backgrounds: a cloistered group of elite Washington insiders and the extreme wing of the progressive green movement. Under their leadership, federal policies cannot help but be infested with fanatic and dangerous ideas.
Gina McCarthyGina McCarthy Solar could provide 40% of electricity production in the United States by 2035, according to Biden administration, White House details environmental benefits plan for underprivileged communities Tom Brady to Biden: “40% of people still don’t think we’ll do it ”MORE, his national climate adviser, is a longtime Washington insider who oscillates between senior government positions and senior positions in extreme environmental groups. As head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during the Obama presidency, one of McCarthy’s main tasks was to carry out the administration’s plan to bankrupt the coal industry under the growing weight of federal regulations. Green groups always regularly applaud his successes in this effort.
John KerryJohn KerryOvernight Energy: EPA finds three pesticides could harm endangered species Balance / sustainability overnight: Tesla attacks Texas power sector Kerry urges China to declare moratorium on funding for coal projects MORE, the president’s special envoy for the climate, occupies a particularly confrontational position. Most would find it difficult to live with the obvious contradiction of serving as special climate envoy and demanding that the world stop greenhouse gas emissions while using a fleet of private jets and yachts, of mansions. and personal vehicles. But not John Kerry; he defended his CO2 emissions, which seem to rival those of a small developing country, as “the only choice for someone like me”.
During his tenure as Governor of Michigan, Secretary of Energy Jennifer granholmJennifer Granholm “The Infrastructure Deal” America Must Make With Herself Where’s Joe Biden’s “Red Line”? Big tech groups engage in series of cybersecurity actions following White House meeting MORE gained experience in redirecting significant government aid towards politically savvy green industries. She combined this experience with an apparent ability to turn close relationships with these green companies into a sizable retirement fund.
Deb HaalandDeb Haaland Interior to move forward with lease sales after hiatus Biden appoints National Park Service director after years as interim head Oil industry trade groups sue Biden administration for hiatus rental PLUS, the Home Secretary, made headlines as a first-year member of the House representing New Mexico when she publicly supported the fracking ban and wholeheartedly supported the Green New Deal .
Tracy Stone-Manning, the president’s candidate to lead the Bureau of Land Management, was involved in a 1989 plot to plant trees. She typed up and then forwarded a letter to another member of the eco-terrorist group EarthFirst! in the United States Forest Service. Stone-Manning defended his actions, saying the letter warns that trees intended for logging have been planted, preventing people from being harmed. His claims have been challenged by other testimony in federal hearings and by the alleged leader of the tree planting plan.
While campaigning as a moderate centrist and convener, the president chose to surround himself with a coterie of extreme anti-energy greens and pampered Washington insiders. Under their influence, Biden’s energy policies refused to promote America’s abundant and cheap domestic energy resources and the jobs they provide. Instead, this administration has chosen to promote energy and jobs for our competitors in global markets and rising home energy costs. Whether you choose to view his reasons in a charitable light or not, the president’s energy policy needs to be rethought for the good of the nation.
Jason Hayes is director of environmental policy at the Mackinac Center in Midland, Michigan. Follow him on twitter @jasonthayes.